Tag Archives: 144 opinions

Rule 144 Holding Period for Stock-for-Stock Acquisitions

Reverse Mergers of OTC Markets microcap companies are typically achieved using a stock-for-stock exchange under which the public company issues restricted stock in exchange for the private stock of the company being “vended in.”

Holding Period of Private Company Stock Does Not Tack under Rule 144

Shareholders in the private company may have already held their private stock for many years prior to the reverse merger.  Thus these private shareholders are often under the mistaken but intuitive impression that they can tack their ownership of the stock in the private company prior to the reverse merger in order to meet the holding period requirement under Under Rule 144.   However, this is not true.

Rule 144 Holding Period Starts Upon the Closing of the Share for Share Exchange

In a stock-for-stock acquisition or reverse merger achieved via a share exchange, the date of closing determines when the Rule 144 holding period starts.  Why?  Because the shareholders receiving OTC Bulletin Board or OTC Markets Pink Sheet public company shares are not at risk until the transaction actually closes and the public company’s shares are actually issued in exchange for the private company’s shares.

The Date of the Merger Agreement Does Start the Rule 144 Holding Period

For example, if the closing of the reverse merger will be delayed until the private company’s financials are audited, then the date of the Merger Agreement or the 8-K announcing the proposed Merger will not determine the start of the Rule 144 holding period.

When the closing is delayed for any reason, the Rule 144 holding period for those receiving the public company’s stock will not start until the reverse merger closes because the recipients will not be at economic risk until that time.

Rule 144 Securities Attorney Opinions by Matheau J. W. Stout, Esq.

Rule 144 has many nuances and experienced securities attorneys issue legal opinions only after a thorough review of all shareholder documents and Issuer filings.   Shareholders seeking Rule 144 or Section 4(a)(1) legal opinions can email documents to OTC securities lawyer Matt Stout at mstout@otclawyers.com or call (410) 429-7076 for a no cost review.

Tacking onto the Holding Period of Convertible Notes under Rule 144

Does Accrued Interest Affect the Holding Period Under Rule 144(d)?

When Convertible Promissory Notes with accrued but unpaid interest are exchanged for stock in a public company, the Rule 144 holding period for the Notes can be tacked to the holding period for the stock under Rule 144(d)(3)(ii) only if the exchange consists only “of other securities of the same Issuer.”

That means no additional consideration can be paid in the exchange other than the securities themselves and is consistent with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933,

Accrued Interest is Not Considered Additional Consideration Under Rule 144

This brings up the question of whether or not accrued but unpaid interest on the Note is construed by the SEC as additional consideration inconsistent with Rule 144(d)(3)(ii).

The SEC’s position is that the right to receive payment for the accrued interest is not additional consideration, and the holding period for the Convertible Promissory Notes can be tacked to the holding period for all shares of stock received in the exchange.

Rule 144 Securities Lawyer Opinion Letters for Debt Conversions

Matheau J. W. Stout, Esq. reviews Notes at no cost in preparation for issuing Rule 144 legal opinions for debt holders in OTC Markets and OTC Bulletin Board companies.  Debt holders can email documents to mstout@otclawyers.com or call Matt Stout at (410) 429-7076 for a free consultation on Rule 144, or on the Section 4(a)(1) alternative to Rule 144 if the securities are at least 2 years old.

Rule 144 Holding Period for Voluntary SEC Filers

What is a Voluntary SEC Filer?

A “voluntary filer” in a public company which continues filing SEC reports like the 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, after its S-1 Registration Statement becomes effective, without technically being required to do so.

For the purposes of calculating a Rule 144 holding period, Voluntary SEC filers are not considered “subject to” the filing requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) because they are not obligated to file Exchange Act reports under either of those sections.

Does Having an Effective S-1 Affect the Rule 144 Holding Period?

Having an S-1 Registration Statement, which is filed under the Securities Act of 1933, rather than under the Exchange Act, does not make a filer “mandatory.”  An SEC filer goes from “voluntary” to “mandatory” by filing certain Exchange Act forms, like the 8A-12g or the Form 10 Registration Statement.   These Exchange Act forms obligate the public company to file the 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K, by making the company “subject to” the filing requirements of Exchange Act Section 13 or 15(d).

Mandatory SEC Filers Have a Six Month Holding Period Under Rule 144

The Six (6) Month holding period requirement in Rule 144(d)(1)(i) applies only to the restricted securities of a public company that is, and has been for at least 90 days immediately prior to the sale, “subject to” the reporting requirements of Exchange Act Section 13 or 15(d).

Voluntary Filers Have a One Year Holding Period Under Rule 144

Because of this distinction, the One (1) Year holding period requirement in Rule 144(d)(1)(ii) applies to the restricted securities of voluntary filers.

Rule 144 and Section 4(a)(1) Opinion Letter Attorney Matt Stout

Shareholders in OTCQB and OTC Bulletin Board companies can contact Rule 144 and S-1 lawyer Matt Stout with questions on clearing and depositing restricted stock at (410) 429-7076 or mstout@otclawyers.com for a no cost review.

Securities Law Opinion Letters Under Rule 144 and 4(1)

Legal Opinions for OTC Markets Issuers and Shareholders

A large part of Matheau Stout’s securities law practice includes the research and drafting of legal opinions for the sale of restricted stock of Issuers listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, Pink Sheets and OTCMarkets.

Rule 144 Opinion Letters

The most common type of securities opinion letter is known as the 144 Letter, or Rule 144 Legal Opinion.   144 Letters are used by Transfer Agents when removing restricted legends from OTC stocks. Most brokerages specializing in OTC Bulletin Board and Pink Sheet stocks will not accept deposits of certificates without a Rule 144 legal opinion drafted by an experienced securities attorney like Matt Stout.

Section 4(a)(1) Legal Opinion Letters

When Rule 144 is not available because the OTC Markets company is a current or former shell, experienced securities attorneys like Matheau J. W. Stout, Esq. can review certificates and documentation to see if Section 4(a)(1) can apply.

Section 4(a)(1) is also known commonly as Section 4-1, and is available only if the securities in question are greater than Two (2) Years old, and the Shareholder is not an Issuer, Underwriter or Dealer.

OTC Markets Securities Lawyer Matt Stout

Shareholders and Brokers can request SEC Rule 144 opinions from Matt Stout, Securities Lawyer by calling (410) 429-7076 or via email, at mjwstout@gmail.com or mstout@otclawyers.com.

More information on clearing restricted stock using Rule 144 and Section 4(a)(1) is available at securities law blogs published by Matheau J. W. Stout including 144letters.net144-Opinions.comRestrictedStock.co, andRestrictedStockOpinion.net.