Monthly Archives: May 2016

Tacking of Rule 144 Holding Periods for Distributions of Stock

Do pro rata distributions of restricted stock from a corporate entity shareholder to its individual shareholders affect the Rule 144 holding period?

No.  Under Rule 144(d), the holding period of the corporate entity shareholder may be tacked onto the holding period of an individual shareholder who receives the distribution of restricted stock.

Documenting the Origin and History of Rule 144 Restricted Stock

In order for a Rule 144 opinion letter to be issued by an experienced OTC Markets Pink Sheet and Bulletin Board securities attorney like Matt Stout, the shareholder must provide documentation showing the origin and history of the shares.  The main task of an OTC securities lawyer issuing Rule 144 legal opinions is to confirm when and how the securities were first issued, and then to track every transaction from that point forward.

Rule 144 Securities Attorney Matt Stout Drafts Legal Opinions for Shareholders

OTC securities lawyer Matheau J. W. Stout, Esq. reviews documents at no cost in preparation for drafting legal opinions under Rule 144 and Section 4(a)(1) for Pink Sheets and OTCMarkets OTCQB stocks.   Shareholders can email certificates and Rule 144 documentation to mstout@otclawyers.com or call Matt Stout at (410) 429-7076 to discuss Rule 144 and clearing restricted stock.

Tacking onto the Holding Period of Convertible Notes under Rule 144

Does Accrued Interest Affect the Holding Period Under Rule 144(d)?

When Convertible Promissory Notes with accrued but unpaid interest are exchanged for stock in a public company, the Rule 144 holding period for the Notes can be tacked to the holding period for the stock under Rule 144(d)(3)(ii) only if the exchange consists only “of other securities of the same Issuer.”

That means no additional consideration can be paid in the exchange other than the securities themselves and is consistent with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933,

Accrued Interest is Not Considered Additional Consideration Under Rule 144

This brings up the question of whether or not accrued but unpaid interest on the Note is construed by the SEC as additional consideration inconsistent with Rule 144(d)(3)(ii).

The SEC’s position is that the right to receive payment for the accrued interest is not additional consideration, and the holding period for the Convertible Promissory Notes can be tacked to the holding period for all shares of stock received in the exchange.

Rule 144 Securities Lawyer Opinion Letters for Debt Conversions

Matheau J. W. Stout, Esq. reviews Notes at no cost in preparation for issuing Rule 144 legal opinions for debt holders in OTC Markets and OTC Bulletin Board companies.  Debt holders can email documents to mstout@otclawyers.com or call Matt Stout at (410) 429-7076 for a free consultation on Rule 144, or on the Section 4(a)(1) alternative to Rule 144 if the securities are at least 2 years old.

When is an Amendment to Form 144 Needed?

Affiliate Shareholders of OTC Markets and Bulletin Board public companies are those serving as Officers, Directors, control persons or owners of more than 9.99% of the Issuers voting securities of any class (“Affiliates”).

Affiliates Submit SEC Form 144 When Selling Restricted Stock

Affiliates of OTC companies know that in order to clear and sell restricted stock, they need to fill out a Form 144 and submit that to their broker, which will allow them to sell up to 1% of the total issued and outstanding common stock of the Issuer within a 90 day period.

Increasing the Number of Shares Sold Requires an Amendment to Form 144

Under Rule 144(h), an amendment to SEC Form 144 needs to be filed if the Affiliate wishes to sell more securities during the 90 day period than was originally declared for sale on the original Form 144.

For example, if an Affiliate files a notice on SEC Form 144 for the proposed sale of less than the full amount of shares that could be sold under the volume limitations set forth in Rule 144(e), but then decides to sell up to 1% of the issued and outstanding, an amendment is needed.  For this reason, it may be wise for Affiliates to consider simply using the 1% number in the original Form 144 filing.

No Form 144 Amendment is Needed if the Affiliate Shares are Unsold

Under Rule 144(h), if the Affiliate filed a Form 144, but does not sell all of the securities referred to during the 90 day period, no amendment needs to be filed with the SEC.

No Form 144 Amendment is Needed Due to a Stock Split

If after an Affiliate’s filing of Form 144, the OTC Issuer declares a stock split,  no new Form 144 filing is needed within the 90 day period to sell the correct number of post-split shares which equate to the number of pre-split shares the Affiliate had already declared on Form 144.  The broker will simply make the adjustment and inform the Affiliate of the new maximum to be sold under the Rule 144 volume trading limitations.

No Form 144 Amendment is Needed to Change Brokers

Individual brokerages may have their own policies on this, but the SEC does not require a new Form 144 or amendment to be filed when an Affiliate uses more than one broker, since it is the share number and trading volume limitation which governs trading, and not the brokerage used to execute the trades.

Likewise, under Rule 144(h), an Affiliate filing Form 144 who indicates that the Affiliate may sell shares through more than one broker is not required to allocate a specific number of shares to each broker on Form 144.

OTC Securities Lawyer Helps Affiliates Sell Restricted Stock

Management and control persons of OTC Markets and Bulletin Board public companies can contact Matt Stout for referrals to OTC brokers and assistance filling out SEC Form 144.   Securities lawyer Matt Stout reviews certificates, filings and documents at no cost to determine if a Rule 144 legal opinion can be issued.   Shareholders can email Matheau J. W. Stout, Esq. at mstout@otclawyers.com or call (410) 429-7076.

When Does the Rule 144 Holding Period Begin When Payment is Escrowed?

As many OTC investors know, Bulletin Board and Pink Sheet Issuers raising capital using a Private Placement Memorandum (“PPM”) sometimes choose to escrow all subscription payments until a minimum amount is raised.

When an OTC private placement offering is made on this type of “minimum/maximum basis”, shares are not issued to investors and proceeds are not delivered to the Issuer from an escrow account unless and until the target minimum amount is sold.

Rule 144(d) Applied to PPM Investors with Escrowed Funds

Under Rule 144(d), the holding period for shares acquired in an OTC Markets company using a “minimum/maximum” offering begins when the shareholder pays for the shares and payment is deposited in the escrow account.

When is the Shareholder Committed to Purchase PPM Shares?

The reason that the Rule 144 holding period begins before the release of the escrowed funds is because the shareholder is committed to participate in the offering if the minimum amount is sold, and that factor is not in the shareholder’s control once the payment is sent and accepted for deposit by the escrow agent.

When are the Shareholder’s Funds At Risk under Rule 144?

This is the moment when the shareholder’s funds are “at risk.”  In contrast, if the language of the subscription or escrow agreement somehow gave the shareholder the right to withdraw the funds upon request, then the funds would not be considered “at risk” and the Rule 144 holding period would not begin to run.

Rule 144 Opinion Attorney Offers No Cost Review of Documents

OTC securities lawyer Matt Stout reviews shareholder documents at no cost in preparation for issuing Rule 144 and Section 4(a)(1) legal opinions to clear restricted stock.

Questions about the Rule 144 holding period, Affiliate Status, and Shell Status are reviewed and if a legal opinion cannot be issued there is no cost to the shareholder.  Contact Matt Stout with Rule 144 questions at (410) 429-7076 or mstout@otclawyers.com.

Rule 144 Holding Period for Shares Issued Per Anti-Dilution Rights

When does the Rule 144 holding period begin for shares received due to anti-dilution rights?

For purposes of Rule 144(d), additional shares of stock acquired from an Issuer pursuant to anti-dilution rights have the same holding period as the original shares governed by the anti-dilution provision.   Another way of saying this is that the new shares can tack onto the holding period of the old shares.

Shareholder Opinion Letters for OTC Markets and Bulletin Board Stocks

OTC securities attorney Matt Stout drafts Rule 144 and Section 4(a)(1) opinion letters for Shareholders of Pink Sheet and Bulletin Board companies trying to clear and sell restricted stock.

Questions regarding Rule 144 holding periods, shell status or Section 4-1 alternatives to Rule 144 can be emailed at mstout@otclawyers.com or (410) 429-7076.

Debt Conversions Under Rule 144(d) and Section 3(a)(9)

Securities exchanged for other securities of the same Issuer under Section 3(a)(9) will be attributed the “character” of the exchanged securities.  This concept is clear under Rule 144(d), which allows for tacking of the old security’s holding period when an Issuer’s convertible debt is exchanged for equity.

Debt Conversions into OTC Stock Under Rule 144(d)

This concept is seen whenever a Debt Holder in an OTC Markets or OTC Bulletin Board company converts a Promissory note into Common Stock.  In that instance, the old security (Promissory Note) is exchanged for the new security (Stock).

Tacking of Rule 144 Holding Period in Debt Conversions

A debt conversion is usually done by a Debt Holder when the Rule 144 holding period has already been met by the Note, so that the Debt Holder may then deposit and sell the newly converted Stock without any additional waiting.

Securities Attorney for Debt Holders in OTC Companies

Debt Holders in OTC Markets and Bulletin Board companies can contact securities lawyer Matt Stout at (410) 429-7076 or mstout@otclawyers for Rule 144 legal opinions or Section 4(a)(1) opinions based on debt conversions.

 

Rule 144(c) Current Public Information Requirement

Shareholders familiar with Rule 144 know that for the Rule 144 Six (6) Month holding period to be used, the public company’s mandatory SEC filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must be current.  When an SEC filer’s Exchange Act reports become delinquent, the One (1) Year holding period under Rule 144 applies (if the company was never a “shell”).

Affiliate Sales of Restricted Stock Using Rule 144

Is this true for Affiliates, who have filed a Form 144 with the intention of selling up to 1% of the public company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock during a 90 day period?

Yes, the Rule 144 “current public information” requirement must be met in order for the Affiliate to sell shares under the Rule 144 safe harbor.  The public company’s filings must remain current in order to meet his requirement at the time each sale is made.

Rule 144 Attorney Drafts Affiliate Legal Opinions

Affiliates of OTC Bulletin Board and OTC Markets companies can contact Rule 144 lawyer Matt Stout for assistance with completing Form 144 and selling restricted stock at (410) 429-7076 or mstout@otclawyers.com.

 

 

 

Securities Received Pursuant to Section 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code

When OTC Markets and OTC Bulletin Board public companies file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, shares are often awarded to creditors as part of the company’s reorganization, and in order to facilitate the settlement of claims against the company.

Are the shares received pursuant to Section 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code considered the same as Rule 144 restricted stock?

No. Securities received pursuant to a Bankruptcy Code proceeding under Section 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code are technically received in a “public offering” under Section 1145(c) of the Code.  For this reason, the shares, which are awarded by Court Order, are considered free trading, as if they were registered.

This is essentially the same rationale which allows shares received in a 3(a)(10) settlement under Court Order to be free trading, and eligible for sale with a securities lawyer’s opinion letter.

Securities Attorney Drafting Legal Opinion Letters for Stock

Shareholders receiving stock under Section 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code or creditors settling claims under Section 3(a)(10) can contact securities lawyer Matt Stout for the legal opinion necessary to deposit and sell their shares at (410) 429-7076 or mstout@otclawyers.com.

Voluntary Filers and the Rule 144 Current Public Information Requirement

The “current public information” requirement under Rule 144(c)(1) is what allows Shareholders of mandatory SEC filers to use the shorter Six (6) Month holding period in order to clear restricted stock.  Only current mandatory SEC filers, which are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) are eligible for this Six (6) Month holding period under Rule 144.

Does the 6 Month Rule 144 Holding Period Apply to Voluntary Filers?

No. A “voluntary filer” is an SEC filer which continues to file SEC forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K after its S-1 Registration Statement is declared Effective by the SEC Staff, but which is not required to do so.  Voluntary Filers are not technically “subject to” the Exchange Act reporting requirements because an S-1 Registration Statement is filed under the Securities Act of 1933.

How Can a Voluntary SEC Filer Become a Mandatory Filer?

In order to become “subject to” the Exchange Act reporting requirements (and qualify for the Six (6) Month Rule 144 Holding Period), a voluntary filer must post an 8A-12G, 8A-12B or a Form 10.

What is the Rule 144 Holding Period for a Voluntary Filer?

Until doing so, the current public information requirement in Rule 144(c)(2) is applicable to voluntary filers, and along with it comes the One (1) Year Holding Period before restricted stock can be cleared for sale.

Rule 144 Lawyer for Legal Opinions to Clear Restricted Stock

OTC Bulletin Board and OTC Markets securities lawyer Matt Stout drafts Rule 144 legal opinion letters and Section 4(a)(1) opinions, and reviews documents at no cost.  Contact an experienced Rule 144 attorney at (410) 429-7076 or mstout@otclawyers.com

Pink Sheets and the Current Public Information Requirement of Rule 144(c)(2)

One of the requirements of Rule 144 is that current information about the Issuer must be publicly available before the sale.

SEC Filers Must Have Audited Financials to Be Current

For SEC reporting companies, this means that the Issuer is current in its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which includes audited financials on forms 10-K, and 10-Q.  Without “current information” an SEC filer will be marked “delinquent” and its Shareholders will not be permitted to use the abbreviated Six (6) Month Holding Period for removing restricted legends on their OTC stock.

Non-Reporting Issuers Do Not Need Audited Financials to Be Marked Pink Current

Non-reporting companies, and voluntary SEC filers, are not eligible for the Six (6) Month holding period even if they are “current” since they are not “subject to” the Exchange Act.

For non-reporting Pink Sheets, being current under the Alternative Reporting Standard means filing an up-to-date Information and Disclosure Statement and either the latest Quarterly Report or Annual Report on OTCMarkets.com.

Together, these OTC Markets filings contain information regarding the nature of the Issuer’s business, its officers and directors, and its financial statements, similar to what would be found in a Form 211 filed under 15c211.

Non-Reporting Pink Sheets are not required to have audited financials in order to meet the current reporting requirement under Rule 144(c)(2).

Securities Attorney for OTC Bulletin Board and OTC Markets Filers

Securities lawyer Matt Stout works with public companies that are delinquent in SEC and OTC Markets filings in order to help them become “current.”   In this context, he can review or draft SEC filings and issue OTC Markets Current Information Legal Opinions for those Issuers filing on OTCIQ.   Matt Stout, securities attorney can be reached at (410) 429-7076 or mstout@otclawyers.com.